1 . 1 . D E P L O Y M E N T A N D D I S T R I B U T I O N
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127
All legal systems provide for rules and mechanisms by means of which a creditor may
enforce an obligation against a debtor when the debtor fails to perform at the time
due. But equally common to legal systems is a specific and distinct regime for the
situation where the debtor not only fails to perform in respect of a single obligation,
but generally fails to perform obligations as they become due. What i s more, the basic
contours of such regimes are generally similar and 'obey time-honoured and polished
economic reason'. They consist of collective procedures, which restrain individual
collection efforts by creditors while divesting the debtor to some extent." The rationale
for a distinct regime is that the situation of insolvency raises particular issues which
are not - and cannot be - adequately addressed by the rules governing a debtor's
default on a single debt. Where a debtor becomes insolvent and multiple cred itors seek
to enforce their debt, two related but distinct issues are raised which insolvency law
is specifically designed to address. On the one hand, the value (and use) of the assets
must be determined and realised (which may be called the question of deployment);
on the other hand, the value/proceeds obtained - or, conversely, the loss suffered -
must be distributed over those involved (which may be called the question of distrib
u t i o n ) .