2 . 3 . DUTY O F C O - O P E R A T I ON

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 

In order to examine whether Member Stales maybe duty bound by Community law

to accord effect to mandatory law of sister Member States beyond the confines of the judgment in Rusli Portuguesn, the Court has consistently held that Community law

does not preclude a Member State from extending its legislation or collective labour

agreements relating to minimum wages to any person employed, even temporarily,

within its territory. These cases concerned enforcement proceedings bv State agencies

against the employer. However, if an employer does not comply with the prescribed

minimum wage in the host Member State, the employee too has a cause of action

and may seek compensation. 1' S/he could do so before the courts of the Member State

not of temporary employment but of the Member State where s/he habitually carries

out his or her work or where the employer is domiciled.1 ; " Then it would be up to that

court to accord effect to the measure (the minimum wage) of the sister Member State.

National law may allow the court to do so, 4 but should it be a question of national

law alone? Giving effect to the measure would still result in an obstacle to trade and

not doing so would still harm the interest taking precedence over the freedoms.