1.6.I. Sufficiently Close Connection
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127
In addition to the regulatory interest and intensity ot national measures, Community
law controls the regulatory (or legislative) jurisdiction of Member States to take
measures (ot private international law). More particularly, Community law requires
a sufficiently close connection between the interests to be protected and the Member
State wishing to take a measure.
As early as Dassonville Advocate Genera! Trabucchi observed that Member States can
derogate on grounds of Article 30 EC only for the purpose of protecting their own
interests and not for the protection of the interests of other Member States. Article 30
EC 'allows every State the right to protect exclusively its own national interests.'1"
Equally 'territorial1 is Advocate General Leger. In ex parte Hedley Loincis he observed
that a Member State can rely on Article 30 EC 'only in order to ensure protection of
decision-making processes.'1 : The regulating State would fail to internalise all the costs,
imposing the costs ol regulation on the Member State where the measure is to take
effect. The Court therefore ensures that Member States within their own respective
spheres of influence and responsibility maintain a certain 'regulatory sovereignty' vis-di'/'
s the other Member States. " ' I n that sense, the requirement is the reverse side of the
Court's judgment in Cassis dc Dijon, where the Court declared that
' [ i | n absence of common rules (relating to the production and marketing of
a l c o h o l . . . ) it is for the Member States to regulate all matters (relating to the production
and marketing of alcohol and alcoholic beverages) on their own territory'.''"