1. FREEDOMS OF COMMUNITY LAW AND NATIONAL PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127
From the very outset it should be realised that the freedoms of Community law and
the private international law of t he Member States are intimately related. The freedoms
aim to guarantee the tree movement of goods, services, persons and capital. For that
purpose they regulate and co-ordinate the application of rules and measures of the
Member States to interstate (economic) intercourse. This is equally the traditional field
of operation of private international law: the co-ordination of various national rules
or legal systems in respect of cross-border legal relationships." In this sense, there is
a certain overlap between the economic freedoms and national private international
law. On the other hand, they operate from fundamentally different perspectives.
National private international law co-ordinates the application of legal norms from
the perspective of (ultimately) nationally defined interests and concepts of (conflicts)
justice. The perspective of the freedoms, however, is one of market-integration: the
establishment and maintenance of an internal market. This difference in perspective
means that their outcomes do not necessarily coincide. In case their outcomes are
irreconcilable, national private international law will have to be modified by virtue
of the principle of the supremacy of Community lawC