2 . 3 . AIMS O F T H E U N C I T R A L M O D E L L AW
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127
The purpose of the Model Law is not to provide straightforward answers. Rather, it
sets up a general framework for co-operation while equipping the various actors with
the necessary means and instruments to effectively give shape to such co-operation.'"'
In its final decision when adopting the Model Law the Commission considers that
'inadequate co-ordination and co-operation' leads to inefficient and unfair administration
of cross-border insolvencies. 'However', it continues to note, 'many states lack
a legislative framework that would make possible or facilitate effective cross-border
co-ordination and co-operation'. Accordingly, the preamble to the Model Law states
that ' t he purpose of this Law i s to provide effective mechanisms ( . . . ) so as to promote
the objectives o f , amongst other things, co-operation. Although stated as an independent
objective, promoting co-operation only makes sense when read in conjunction
with the other objectives. These goals are to achieve greater legal certainty; a fair
and efficient administration that protects the interests of all creditors and other
interested parties; the protection and maximisation of the value of the debtor's assets;
and, finally, the facilitation of the rescue of financially troubled businesses, thereby
protecting investment and preserving employment.