2 . 2 . T E R R I T O R I A L I TY
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127
Aside from the characterisation of insolvency as belonging to the realm oistatuta realici
in the historic context of the statutist approach to conflicts of l a w , " : the predominant
justifications for territoriality have been derived from insolvency law's public policy
nature. Many authors have directly linked insolvency law with public law and ordre
public and therefore with sovereignty and its territorial limits.1 Thus it has been
argued that as an expression of Staatsgewalt the effects of insolvency proceedings are
subject to the same territorial limits.'"' Others focus on insolvency law as being part
of the law of enforcement, involving a general attachment and execution, or as being
part of the law of procedure generally, leading to the same territorial limits."" Arguments
in favour of territoriality have also been derived from the risks and costs ol
accepting universality in respect of local creditors, debtors and society at large.""'