2.3.4. Distortion of Competition; Affecting Trade between Member States
17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33
34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50
51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101
102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118
119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127
For a state aid measure to be caught by the prohibition ot Article 87 EC, a measure
must further distort competition as well as affect trade between the Member States.
In respect of the first of these two requirements, once it has been established that state
aid is provided, the conclusion that the aid distorts competition is almost automatic.
As state aid must benefit certain undertakings or production of goods, the competitiveness
of the recipient(s) is increased vis-a-vis its competitors. It therefore concerns very
nearly a per se rule.'"" The risk of distorting competition is considered especially high
in the case of aids to firms in financial difficulty, aiming to prevent their liquidation
and market-exit with a reallocation of resources."" The Commission regards aid in
these circumstances with particular concern. ' I b i s is well reflected in the Commission s
policy and practice. For instance, in its decision concerning aid by Spanish authorities
to Mcgafcsa the Commission stated:
Aid to firms in difficulties carries the greatest risk of transferring unemployment
and industrial problems from one Member State to another; it acts as a means of
preserving the status quo by preventing forces at work in the market economy from
their normal consequences in terms of disappearance of inefficient firms in their
process of adaptation to changing conditions in competition."
The detrimental effects of this type of aid is not limited to global distortions - between
Member States - but may also concern generic or specific - between sectors or undertakings-
distortions."- Thus in Hestwooif concerning German state aid in an attempt
to rescue a previously privatised company, the Commission observed that
the aid was intended only to maintain the status quo and postpone the inevitable,
while at the same time it transferred the attendant industrial and social problems
to other, more efficient producers and other Member States rather than supporting
a restructuring process which should have been initiated when the rescue aid was
granted."'
Section Two. Community Law and Cross-Border Insolvency Regulation
Iii respect of the requirement of'Articlc 87 EC that the state aid must affect the trade
between Member States, it should be noted that the Commission has adopted a Regulation
concerning a tie minimis exemption for state aid.'" The notice sets a threshold
of 100.000 EUR granted over three years. Aid not exceeding this figure will bo presumed
not to affect trade between Member State and is exempted from the requirement
of prior notification.''